next-test-api-route-handler

Confidently unit test your Next.js API routes/handlers in an isolated Next.js-like environment

Usage no npm install needed!

<script type="module">
  import nextTestApiRouteHandler from 'https://cdn.skypack.dev/next-test-api-route-handler';
</script>

README

Black Lives Matter! Maintenance status Last commit timestamp Open issues Pull requests Codecov Source license Tree shaking support Compressed package size NPM version Uses Semantic Release!

next-test-api-route-handler

Trying to unit test your Next.js API route handlers? Want to avoid mucking around with custom servers and writing boring test infra just to get some unit tests working? Want your handlers to receive actual NextApiRequest and NextApiResponse objects rather than having to hack something together with express? Then look no further! 🤩

next-test-api-route-handler (NTARH) uses Next.js's internal API resolver to precisely emulate API route handling. To guarantee stability, this package is automatically tested against each release of Next.js and Node.js. Go forth and test confidently!

✨ ✨

Install

Step One: Install NTARH

npm install --save-dev next-test-api-route-handler

Step Two: Install Peer Dependencies

If you are using npm@<7 or node@<15, you must install Next.js and its peer dependencies manually. This is because npm@<7 does not install peer dependencies by default. If you're using a modern version of NPM, you can skip this step.

npm install --save-dev next@latest react

If you're also using an older version of Next.js, ensure you install the peer dependencies (like react) that your specific Next.js version requires!

Legacy Next.js Support

As of version 2.1.0, NTARH is fully backwards compatible with Next.js going allll the way back to next@9.0.0 when API routes were first introduced!

If you're working with next@<9.0.6 (so: before next-server was merged into next), you might need to install next-server manually:

npm install --save-dev next-server

Usage

// ESM
import { testApiHandler } from 'next-test-api-route-handler';

// CJS
const { testApiHandler } = require('next-test-api-route-handler');

Quick start:

/* File: test/unit.test.ts */

import { testApiHandler } from 'next-test-api-route-handler';
// Import the handler under test from the pages/api directory
import endpoint, { config } from '../pages/api/your-endpoint';
import type { PageConfig } from 'next';

// Respect the Next.js config object if it's exported
const handler: typeof endpoint & { config?: PageConfig } = endpoint;
handler.config = config;

await testApiHandler({
  handler,
  requestPatcher: (req) => (req.headers = { key: process.env.SPECIAL_TOKEN }),
  test: async ({ fetch }) => {
    const res = await fetch({ method: 'POST', body: 'data' });
    await expect(res.json()).resolves.toStrictEqual({ hello: 'world' }); // ◄ Passes!
  }
});

// NTARH also supports typed response data via TypeScript generics:
await testApiHandler<{ hello: string }>({
  // The next line would cause TypeScript to complain:
  // handler: (_, res) => res.status(200).send({ hello: false }),
  handler: (_, res) => res.status(200).send({ hello: 'world' }),
  requestPatcher: (req) => (req.headers = { key: process.env.SPECIAL_TOKEN }),
  test: async ({ fetch }) => {
    const res = await fetch({ method: 'POST', body: 'data' });
    // The next line would cause TypeScript to complain:
    // const { goodbye: hello } = await res.json();
    const { hello } = await res.json();
    expect(hello).toBe('world'); // ◄ Passes!
  }
});

The interface for testApiHandler without generics looks like this:

async function testApiHandler(args: {
  rejectOnHandlerError?: boolean;
  requestPatcher?: (req: IncomingMessage) => void;
  responsePatcher?: (res: ServerResponse) => void;
  paramsPatcher?: (params: Record<string, unknown>) => void;
  params?: Record<string, unknown>;
  url?: string;
  handler: (req: NextApiRequest, res: NextApiResponse) => Promise<void>;
  test: (args: { fetch: (customInit?: RequestInit) => FetchReturnType }) => Promise<void>;
});

requestPatcher

A function that receives an IncomingMessage. Use this function to modify the request before it's injected into Next.js's resolver. To just set the request url, e.g. requestPatcher: (req) => (req.url = '/my-url?some=query'), use the url shorthand, e.g. url: '/my-url?some=query'.

More often than not, manually setting the request url is unnecessary. Only set the url if your handler expects it or you want to use automatic query string parsing instead of params/paramsPatcher.

responsePatcher

A function that receives a ServerResponse. Use this function to modify the response before it's injected into Next.js's resolver.

paramsPatcher

A function that receives an object representing "processed" dynamic routes, e.g. testing a handler that expects /api/user/:id requires paramPatcher: (params) => (params.id = 'test-id'). Route parameters can also be passed using the params shorthand, e.g. params: { id: 'test-id', ... }. If both paramsPatcher and the params shorthand are used, paramsPatcher will receive an object like { ...queryStringURLParams, ...params }.

Route parameters should not be confused with query string parameters, which are automatically parsed out from the url and added to the params object before paramsPatcher is evaluated.

handler

The actual route handler under test (usually imported from pages/api/*). It should be an async function that accepts NextApiRequest and NextApiResponse objects as its two parameters.

As of version 2.3.0, unhandled errors in the handler function are kicked up to Next.js to handle. This means testApiHandler will NOT reject or throw if an unhandled error occurs in handler, which includes failing Jest expect() assertions. Instead, the response returned by fetch() in your test function will have a HTTP 500 status thanks to how Next.js deals with unhandled errors in production. Prior to 2.3.0, NTARH's behavior on unhandled errors in handler and elsewhere was inconsistent. Version 3.0.0 further improves error handling, ensuring no errors slip by uncaught.

To guard against false negatives, you can do either of the following:

  1. Make sure the status of the fetch() response is what you're expecting:
const res = await fetch();
...
// For this test, a 403 status is what we wanted
expect(res.status).toBe(403);
...
const res2 = await fetch();
...
// Later, we expect an "unhandled" error
expect(res2.status).toBe(500);
  1. If you're using version >=3.0.0, you can use rejectOnHandlerError to tell NTARH to intercept unhandled handler errors and reject the promise returned by testApiHandler instead of relying on Next.js to respond with HTTP 500. This is especially useful if you have expect() assertions inside your handler function:
await expect(
  testApiHandler({
    rejectOnHandlerError: true, // <==
    handler: (res) => {
      res.status(200);
      throw new Error('bad bad not good');
    },
    test: async ({ fetch }) => {
      const res = await fetch();
      // By default, res.status would be 500...
      //expect(res.status).toBe(500);
    }
  })
  // ...but since we used rejectOnHandlerError, the whole promise rejects
  // instead
).rejects.toThrow('bad not good');

await testApiHandler({
  rejectOnHandlerError: true, // <==
  handler: async (res) => {
    // Suppose this expectation fails
    await expect(backend.getSomeStuff()).resolves.toStrictEqual(someStuff);
  },
  test: async ({ fetch }) => {
    await fetch();
    // By default, res.status would be 500 due to the failing expect(). If we
    // don't also expect() a non-500 response status here, the failing
    // expectation in the handler will be swallowed and the test will pass
    // (a false negative).
  }
});
// ...but since we used rejectOnHandlerError, the whole promise rejects
// and Jest reports that the test failed, which is probably what you wanted.

test

A function that returns a promise (or async) where test assertions can be run. This function receives one destructured parameter: fetch, which is a simple node-fetch instance. Use this to send HTTP requests to the handler under test.

Note that fetch's url parameter, i.e. the first parameter in fetch(...), is omitted.

As of version 3.1.0, NTARH adds the x-msw-bypass: true header to all requests by default. You can use fetch's customInit parameter to override this behavior if desired.

response.cookies

As of version 2.3.0, the response object returned by fetch() includes a non-standard cookies field containing an array of objects representing set-cookie response header(s) parsed by the cookie package. Use the cookies field to easily access a response's cookie data in your tests.

Here's an example taken straight from the unit tests:

import { testApiHandler } from 'next-test-api-route-handler';

it('handles multiple set-cookie headers', async () => {
  expect.hasAssertions();

  await testApiHandler({
    handler: (_, res) => {
      // NOTE: multiple calls to setHeader('Set-Cookie', ...) overwrite previous
      res.setHeader('Set-Cookie', [
        serializeCookieHeader('access_token', '1234', { expires: new Date() }),
        serializeCookieHeader('REFRESH_TOKEN', '5678')
      ]);
      res.status(200).send({});
      // NOTE: if using node@>=14, you can use a more fluent interface, i.e.:
      // res.setHeader(...).status(200).send({});
    },
    test: async ({ fetch }) => {
      expect((await fetch()).status).toBe(200);
      await expect((await fetch()).json()).resolves.toStrictEqual({});
      expect((await fetch()).cookies).toStrictEqual([
        {
          access_token: '1234',
          // Lowercased cookie property keys are available
          expires: expect.any(String),
          // Raw cookie property keys are also available
          Expires: expect.any(String)
        },
        { refresh_token: '5678', REFRESH_TOKEN: '5678' }
      ]);
    }
  });
});

Real-World Examples

Testing Next.js's Official Apollo Example @ pages/api/graphql

You can easily run this example yourself by copying and pasting the following commands into your terminal.

The following should be run in a nix-like environment. On Windows, that's WSL. Requires curl, node, and git.

git clone --depth=1 https://github.com/vercel/next.js /tmp/ntarh-test
cd /tmp/ntarh-test/examples/api-routes-apollo-server-and-client
npm install
npm install next-test-api-route-handler jest babel-jest @babel/core @babel/preset-env graphql-tools
# You could test with an older version of Next.js if you want, e.g.:
# npm install next@9.0.6 --force
# Or even older:
# npm install next@9.0.0 next-server --force
echo 'module.exports={"presets":["next/babel"]};' > babel.config.js
mkdir test
curl -o test/my.test.js https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Xunnamius/next-test-api-route-handler/main/apollo_test_raw
npx jest

The above script will clone the Next.js repository, install NTARH and configure dependencies, download the following script, and run it with jest.

Note that passing the route configuration object (imported below as config) through to NTARH and setting request.url to the proper value is crucial when testing Apollo endpoints!

/* File: examples/api-routes-apollo-server-and-client/tests/my.test.js */

import { testApiHandler } from 'next-test-api-route-handler';
// Import the handler under test from the pages/api directory
import handler, { config } from '../pages/api/graphql';
// Respect the Next.js config object if it's exported
handler.config = config;

describe('my-test', () => {
  it('does what I want 1', async () => {
    expect.hasAssertions();

    await testApiHandler({
      handler,
      url: '/api/graphql', // Set the request url to the path graphql expects
      test: async ({ fetch }) => {
        const query = `query ViewerQuery {
          viewer {
            id
            name
            status
          }
        }`;

        const res = await fetch({
          method: 'POST',
          headers: {
            'content-type': 'application/json' // Must use correct content type
          },
          body: JSON.stringify({
            query
          })
        });

        await expect(res.json()).resolves.toStrictEqual({
          data: { viewer: { id: '1', name: 'John Smith', status: 'cached' } }
        });
      }
    });
  });

  it('does what I want 2', async () => {
    // Exactly the same as the above...
  });

  it('does what I want 3', async () => {
    // Exactly the same as the above...
  });
});

Testing an Unreliable API Handler @ pages/api/unreliable

Suppose we have an API endpoint we use to test our application's error handling. The endpoint responds with status code HTTP 200 for every request except the 10th, where status code HTTP 555 is returned instead.

How might we test that this endpoint responds with HTTP 555 once for every nine HTTP 200 responses?

/* File: test/unit.test.ts */

// Import the handler under test from the pages/api directory
import endpoint, { config } from '../pages/api/unreliable';
import { testApiHandler } from 'next-test-api-route-handler';

import type { PageConfig } from 'next';

const expectedReqPerError = 10;

// Respect the Next.js config object if it's exported
const handler: typeof endpoint & { config?: PageConfig } = endpoint;
handler.config = config;

it('injects contrived errors at the required rate', async () => {
  expect.hasAssertions();

  // Signal to the endpoint (which is configurable) that there should be 1
  // error among every 10 requests
  process.env.REQUESTS_PER_CONTRIVED_ERROR = expectedReqPerError.toString();

  await testApiHandler({
    handler,
    test: async ({ fetch }) => {
      // Run 20 requests with REQUESTS_PER_CONTRIVED_ERROR = '10' and
      // record the results
      const results1 = await Promise.all(
        [
          ...Array.from({ length: expectedReqPerError - 1 }).map(() =>
            fetch({ method: 'GET' })
          ),
          fetch({ method: 'POST' }),
          ...Array.from({ length: expectedReqPerError - 1 }).map(() =>
            fetch({ method: 'PUT' })
          ),
          fetch({ method: 'DELETE' })
        ].map((p) => p.then((r) => r.status))
      );

      process.env.REQUESTS_PER_CONTRIVED_ERROR = '0';

      // Run 10 requests with REQUESTS_PER_CONTRIVED_ERROR = '0' and record the
      // results
      const results2 = await Promise.all(
        Array.from({ length: expectedReqPerError }).map(() =>
          fetch().then((r) => r.status)
        )
      );

      // We expect results1 to be an array with eighteen `200`s and two
      // `555`s in any order
      //
      // https://github.com/jest-community/jest-extended#toincludesamemembersmembers
      // because responses could be received out of order
      expect(results1).toIncludeSameMembers([
        ...Array.from({ length: expectedReqPerError - 1 }).map(() => 200),
        555,
        ...Array.from({ length: expectedReqPerError - 1 }).map(() => 200),
        555
      ]);

      // We expect results2 to be an array with ten `200`s
      expect(results2).toStrictEqual([
        ...Array.from({ length: expectedReqPerError }).map(() => 200)
      ]);
    }
  });
});

Testing a Flight Search API Handler @ pages/api/v3/flights/search

Suppose we have an authenticated API endpoint our application uses to search for flights. The endpoint responds with an array of flights satisfying the query.

How might we test that this endpoint returns flights in our database as expected?

/* File: test/unit.test.ts */

import endpoint, { config } from '../pages/api/v3/flights/search';
import { testApiHandler } from 'next-test-api-route-handler';
import { DUMMY_API_KEY as KEY, getFlightData, RESULT_SIZE } from '../backend';

import type { PageConfig } from 'next';

// Respect the Next.js config object if it's exported
const handler: typeof endpoint & { config?: PageConfig } = endpoint;
handler.config = config;

it('returns expected public flights with respect to match', async () => {
  expect.hasAssertions();

  // Get the flight data currently in the test database
  const expectedFlights = getFlightData();

  // Take any JSON object and stringify it into a URL-ready string
  const encode = (o: Record<string, unknown>) =>
    encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify(o));

  // This function will return in order the URIs we're interested in testing
  // against our handler. Query strings are parsed by NTARH automatically.
  //
  // NOTE: setting the request url manually using encode(), while valid, is
  // unnecessary here; we could have used `params` or `paramPatcher` to do this
  // more easily without explicitly setting a dummy request url.
  //
  // Example URI for `https://site.io/path?param=yes` would be `/path?param=yes`
  const genUrl = (function* () {
    // For example, the first should match all the flights from Spirit airlines!
    yield `/?match=${encode({ airline: 'Spirit' })}`;
    yield `/?match=${encode({ type: 'departure' })}`;
    yield `/?match=${encode({ landingAt: 'F1A' })}`;
    yield `/?match=${encode({ seatPrice: 500 })}`;
    yield `/?match=${encode({ seatPrice: { $gt: 500 } })}`;
    yield `/?match=${encode({ seatPrice: { $gte: 500 } })}`;
    yield `/?match=${encode({ seatPrice: { $lt: 500 } })}`;
    yield `/?match=${encode({ seatPrice: { $lte: 500 } })}`;
  })();

  await testApiHandler({
    // Patch the request object to include our dummy URI
    requestPatcher: (req) => {
      req.url = genUrl.next().value || undefined;
      // Could have done this instead of `fetch({ headers: { KEY }})` below:
      // req.headers = { KEY };
    },

    handler,

    test: async ({ fetch }) => {
      // 8 URLS from genUrl means 8 calls to fetch:
      const responses = await Promise.all(
        Array.from({ length: 8 }).map(() =>
          fetch({ headers: { KEY } }).then(async (r) => [
            r.status,
            await r.json()
          ])
        )
      );

      // We expect all of the responses to be 200
      expect(responses.some(([status]) => status != 200)).toBe(false);

      // We expect the array of flights returned to match our
      // expectations given we already know what dummy data will be
      // returned:

      // https://github.com/jest-community/jest-extended#toincludesamemembersmembers
      // because responses could be received out of order
      expect(responses.map(([, r]) => r.flights)).toIncludeSameMembers([
        expectedFlights
          .filter((f) => f.airline == 'Spirit')
          .slice(0, RESULT_SIZE),
        expectedFlights
          .filter((f) => f.type == 'departure')
          .slice(0, RESULT_SIZE),
        expectedFlights
          .filter((f) => f.landingAt == 'F1A')
          .slice(0, RESULT_SIZE),
        expectedFlights.filter((f) => f.seatPrice == 500).slice(0, RESULT_SIZE),
        expectedFlights.filter((f) => f.seatPrice > 500).slice(0, RESULT_SIZE),
        expectedFlights.filter((f) => f.seatPrice >= 500).slice(0, RESULT_SIZE),
        expectedFlights.filter((f) => f.seatPrice < 500).slice(0, RESULT_SIZE),
        expectedFlights.filter((f) => f.seatPrice <= 500).slice(0, RESULT_SIZE)
      ]);
    }
  });

  // We expect these two to fail with 400 errors

  await testApiHandler({
    handler,
    url: `/?match=${encode({ ffms: { $eq: 500 } })}`,
    test: async ({ fetch }) =>
      expect((await fetch({ headers: { KEY } })).status).toBe(400)
  });

  await testApiHandler({
    handler,
    url: `/?match=${encode({ bad: 500 })}`,
    test: async ({ fetch }) =>
      expect((await fetch({ headers: { KEY } })).status).toBe(400)
  });
});

Check out the tests for more examples.

Documentation

Further documentation can be found under docs/.

This is a dual CJS2/ES module package. That means this package exposes both CJS2 and ESM (treeshakable and non-treeshakable) entry points.

Loading this package via require(...) will cause Node and some bundlers to use the CJS2 bundle entry point. This can reduce the efficacy of tree shaking. Alternatively, loading this package via import { ... } from ... or import(...) will cause Node (and other JS runtimes) to use the non-treeshakable ESM entry point in versions that support it. Modern bundlers like Webpack and Rollup will use the treeshakable ESM entry point. Hence, using the import syntax is the modern, preferred choice.

For backwards compatibility with Node versions < 14, package.json retains the main key, which points to the CJS2 entry point explicitly (using the .js file extension). For Node versions > 14, package.json includes the more modern exports key. For bundlers, package.json includes the bundler-specific module key (eventually superseded by exports['.'].module), which points to ESM source loosely compiled specifically to support tree shaking.

Though package.json includes { "type": "commonjs"}, note that the ESM entry points are ES module (.mjs) files. package.json also includes the sideEffects key, which is false for optimal tree shaking, and the types key, which points to a TypeScript declarations file.

Additionally, this package does maintain shared state (i.e. memoized imports, stateful error handling); regardless, it does not exhibit the dual package hazard.

License

FOSSA analysis

Contributing and Support

New issues and pull requests are always welcome and greatly appreciated! 🤩 Just as well, you can star 🌟 this project to let me know you found it useful! ✊🏿 Thank you!

See CONTRIBUTING.md and SUPPORT.md for more information.